Identifying distinct neural features between the initial and corrective phases of precise reaching using AutoLFADS.

Many initial movements require subsequent corrective movements, but how motor cortex transitions to make corrections and how similar the encoding is to initial movements is unclear. In our study, we explored how the brain's motor cortex signals both initial and corrective movements during a precision reaching task. We recorded a large population of neurons from two male rhesus macaques across multiple sessions to examine the neural firing rates during not only initial movements but also subsequent corrective movements. AutoLFADS, an auto-encoder-based deep-learning model, was applied to provide a clearer picture of neurons' activity on individual corrective movements across sessions. Decoding of reach velocity generalized poorly from initial to corrective submovements. Unlike initial movements, it was challenging to predict the velocity of corrective movements using traditional linear methods in a single, global neural space. We identified several locations in the neural space where corrective submovements originated after the initial reaches, signifying firing rates different than the baseline before initial movements. To improve corrective movement decoding, we demonstrate that a state-dependent decoder incorporating the population firing rates at the initiation of correction improved performance, highlighting the diverse neural features of corrective movements. In summary, we show neural differences between initial and corrective submovements and how the neural activity encodes specific combinations of velocity and position. These findings are inconsistent with assumptions that neural correlations with kinematic features are global and independent, emphasizing that traditional methods often fall short in describing these diverse neural processes for online corrective movements.Significance Statement We analyzed submovement neural population dynamics during precision reaching. Using an auto-encoder-based deep-learning model, AutoLFADS, we examined neural activity on a single-trial basis. Our study shows distinct neural dynamics between initial and corrective submovements. We demonstrate the existence of unique neural features within each submovement class that encode complex combinations of position and reach direction. Our study also highlights the benefit of state-specific decoding strategies, which consider the neural firing rates at the onset of any given submovement, when decoding complex motor tasks such as corrective submovements.

Identifying distinct neural features between the initial and corrective phases of precise reaching using AutoLFADS.

Many initial movements require subsequent corrective movements, but how motor cortex transitions to make corrections and how similar the encoding is to initial movements is unclear. In our study, we explored how the brain's motor cortex signals both initial and corrective movements during a precision reaching task. We recorded a large population of neurons from two male rhesus macaques across multiple sessions to examine the neural firing rates during not only initial movements but also subsequent corrective movements. AutoLFADS, an auto-encoder-based deep-learning model, was applied to provide a clearer picture of neurons' activity on individual corrective movements across sessions. Decoding of reach velocity generalized poorly from initial to corrective submovements. Unlike initial movements, it was challenging to predict the velocity of corrective movements using traditional linear methods in a single, global neural space. We identified several locations in the neural space where corrective submovements originated after the initial reaches, signifying firing rates different than the baseline before initial movements. To improve corrective movement decoding, we demonstrate that a state-dependent decoder incorporating the population firing rates at the initiation of correction improved performance, highlighting the diverse neural features of corrective movements. In summary, we show neural differences between initial and corrective submovements and how the neural activity encodes specific combinations of velocity and position. These findings are inconsistent with assumptions that neural correlations with kinematic features are global and independent, emphasizing that traditional methods often fall short in describing these diverse neural processes for online corrective movements. Significance Statement: We analyzed submovement neural population dynamics during precision reaching. Using an auto- encoder-based deep-learning model, AutoLFADS, we examined neural activity on a single-trial basis. Our study shows distinct neural dynamics between initial and corrective submovements. We demonstrate the existence of unique neural features within each submovement class that encode complex combinations of position and reach direction. Our study also highlights the benefit of state-specific decoding strategies, which consider the neural firing rates at the onset of any given submovement, when decoding complex motor tasks such as corrective submovements.

Initial and corrective submovement encoding differences within primary motor cortex during precision reaching.

Precision reaching tasks often require corrective submovements for successful completion. Most studies of reaching have focused on single initial movements, and the cortical encoding model was implied to be the same for all submovements. However, corrective submovements may show different encoding patterns from the initial submovement with distinct patterns of activation across the population. Two rhesus macaques performed a precision center-out-task with small targets. Neural activity from single units in primary motor cortex and associated behavioral data were recorded to evaluate movement characteristics. Neural population data and individual neuronal firing rates identified with a peak finding algorithm to identify peaks in hand speed were examined for encoding differences between initial and corrective submovements. Individual neurons were fitted with a regression model that included the reach vector, position, and speed to predict firing rate. For both initial and corrective submovements, the largest effect remained movement direction. We observed a large subset changed their preferred direction greater than 45° between initial and corrective submovements. Neuronal depth of modulation also showed considerable variation when adjusted for movement speed. By utilizing principal component analysis, neural trajectories of initial and corrective submovements progressed through different neural subspaces. These findings all suggest that different neural encoding patterns exist for initial and corrective submovements within the cortex. We hypothesize that this variation in how neurons change to encode small, corrective submovements might allow for a larger portion of the neural space being used to encode a greater range of movements with varying amplitudes and levels of precision. New and Noteworthy: Neuronal recordings matched with kinematic behavior were collected in a precision center-out task that often required corrective movements. We reveal large differences in preferred direction and depth of modulation between initial and corrective submovements across the neural population. We then present a model of the neural population describing how these shifts in tuning create different subspaces for signaling initial and corrective movements likely to improve motor precision.